References

catal

Катализ в промышленности

Kataliz v promyshlennosti

1816-03872413-6476

LLC "KALVIS"

10.18412/1816-0387-2022-3-38-65

catal-821

Research Article

КАТАЛИЗ В НЕФТЕПЕРЕРАБАТЫВАЮЩЕЙ ПРОМЫШЛЕННОСТИ

СATALYSIS IN PETROLEUM REFINING INDUSTRY

Дезактивация катализаторов гидроочистки (обзор)

Deactivation of hydrotreating catalysts (A review)

Будуква

С. В.

Budukva

S. V.

ctls@kalvis.ru

Уваркина

Д. Д.

Uvarkina

D. D.

ctls@kalvis.ru

Климов

О. В.

Klimov

O. V.

ctls@kalvis.ru

Носков

А. С.

Noskov

A. S.

ctls@kalvis.ru

Институт катализа им. Г.К. Борескова СО РАН (ИК СО РАН), НовосибирскРоссияBoreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS, NovosibirskRussian Federation

2022

26052022

2233865

2022

LLC "KALVIS"

https://www.catalysis-kalvis.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice

https://www.catalysis-kalvis.ru/jour/article/view/821

В представленном обзоре рассмотрены и систематизированы результаты исследований по дезактивации катализаторов гидроочистки, имеющиеся на данный момент в научной и технической литературе. Показано влияние состава сырья и условий проведения процесса гидроочистки на закоксовывание катализаторов. Рассмотрены причины изменения морфологии активного компонента и возможности снижения этого типа дезактивации катализаторов в процессе промышленной эксплуатации. Показано влияние перепада давления по слою катализатора на продолжительность пробега, действие каталитических ядов и пути их попадания в дистилляты гидроочистки. Данный обзор может быть интересен и полезен инженерам-химикам, занятым исследованиями каталитических систем, а также сотрудникам нефтеперерабатывающей промышленности.

The results of studies on deactivation of hydrotreating catalysts reported in scientific and technical literature are considered and systematized in the review. The effect exerted by the feedstock composition and hydrotreatment conditions on the catalyst coking is revealed. The factorsleading to changes in the morphology of active component and the possibilities to weaken this type of catalyst deactivation during commercial operation are considered. The effect of a pressure drop over the catalyst bed on the run time as well as the action of catalytic poisons and the ways of their penetration into hydrotreatment distillates are shown. This review can be interesting and useful to chemical engineers involved in the study of catalytic systems and to oil industry specialists.

дезактивациягидроочисткакокссегрегацияперепад давления

deactivationhydrotreatingcokesegregationpressure drop

References1

Bartholomew C.H. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2001. Vol. 212, № 1/2. P. 17–60.

Topsøe H. // Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2007. Vol. 322, № Suppl. P. 3–8.

Lauritsen J.V., Kibsgaard J., Olesen G.H. et al. // J. Catal. 2007. Vol. 249, № 2. P. 220–233.

Eijsbouts S. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 1997. Vol. 158, № 1/2. P. 53–92.

Leliveld B.R.G., van Dillen J.A.J., Geus J.W. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 1997. Vol. 101, № 51. P. 11160–11171.

De Beer V.H.J., Van Sint Fiet T.H.M., Van Der Steen G.H.A.M. et al. // J. Catal. 1974. Vol. 35, № 2. P. 297–306.

Schuit G.C.A., Gates B.C. // AIChE J. 1973. Vol. 19, № 3. P. 417–438.

Voorhoeve R.J.H. // J. Catal. 1971. Vol. 23, № 2. P. 236–242.

Baeza P., Ureta-Zañartu M.S., Escalona N. et al. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2004. Vol. 274, № 1/2. P. 303–309.

Pajonk G.M. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2000. Vol. 202, № 2. P. 157–169.

Daage M., Chianelli R.R., Ruppert A.F. // Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis. 1993. Vol. 75, № C. P. 571–584.

Daage M., Chianelli R.R. // J. Catal. 1994. Vol. 149, № 2. P. 414–427.

Topsøe H., Candia R., Topsøe N.-Y., Clausen B.S. // Bull. des Sociétés Chim. Belges. 2010. Vol. 93, № 8/9. P. 783–806.

Topsøe H., Clausen B.S. // Catal. Rev. 1984. Vol. 26, № 3/4. P. 395–420.

Bouwens S.M.A.M., Vanzon F.B.M., Vandijk M.P. et al. // J. Catal. 1994. Vol. 146, № 2. P. 375–393.

Kibsgaard J., Lauritsen J.V., Lægsgaard E. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006. Vol. 128, № 42. P. 13950–13958.

Eijsbouts S., Van Den Oetelaar L.C.A., Van Puijenbroek R.R. // J. Catal. 2005. Vol. 229, № 2. P. 352–364.

Bergwerff J.A., Jansen M., Leliveld B.(R.)G. et al. // J. Catal. 2006. Vol. 243, № 2. P. 292–302.

Crajé M.W.J., Debeer V.H.J., Vanveen J.A.R., Vanderkraan A.M. // J. Catal. 1993. Vol. 143, № 2. P. 601–615.

Okamoto Y., Breysse M., Dhar G.M., Song C. // Catal. Today. 2003. Vol. 86, № 1–4. P. 1–3.

Kotter M., Riekert L. // Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis. 1979. Vol. 3, № C. P. 51–63.

Cattaneo R., Shido T., Prins R. // J. Catal. 1999. Vol. 185, № 1. P. 199–212.

Rajagopal S., Grimm T.L., Collins D.J., Miranda R. // J. Catal. 1992. Vol. 137, № 2. P. 453–461.

Ishihara A., Dumeignil F., Wang D. et al. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2005. Vol. 292, № 1/2. P. 50–60.

Mazurelle J., Lamonier C., Lancelot C.et al. // Catal. Today. 2008. Vol. 130, № 1. P. 41–49.

Breysse M., Portefaix J.L., Vrinat M. // Catal. Today. 1991. Vol. 10, № 4. P. 489–505.

Segawa K., Satoh S. // Catal. Today. 1996. Vol. 29, № 1-4. P. 215–219.

Li D. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 1998. Vol. 16, № 3. P. 255–260.

Li D., Sato T., Imamura M. et al. // J. Catal. 1997. Vol. 170, № 2. P. 357–365.

Klimov O. V., Vatutina Yu.V., Nadeina K.A. et al. // Catal. Today. 2018. Vol. 305. P. 192–202.

Pérez-Martínez D.J., Gaigneaux E.M., Giraldo S.A. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2012. Vol. 421–422. P. 48–57.

Nadeina K.A., Klimov O.V., Pereima V.Yu. et al. // Catal. Today. 2016. Vol. 271. P. 4–15.

La Parola V., Deganello G., Scirè S., Venezia A.M. // J. Solid State Chem. 2003. Vol. 174, № 2. P. 482–488.

Gheek P., Suppan S., Trawczyński J. et al. // Catal. Today. 2007. Vol. 119, № 1–4. P. 19–22.

Sakanishi K., Nagamatsu T., Mochida I., Whitehurst D.D. // J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2000. Vol. 155, № 1/2. P. 101–109.

Farag H., Mochida I., Sakanishi K. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2000. Vol. 194. P. 147–157.

Ancheyta J., Rana M.S., Furimsky E. // Catal. Today. 2005. Vol. 109, № 1–4. P. 3–15.

Dufresne P. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2007. Vol. 322. P. 67–75.

Marafi A., Stanislaus A., Furimsky E. // Catal. Rev. - Sci. Eng. 2010. Vol. 52, № 2. P. 204–324.

Marafi A., Maruyama F., Sanislaus A.M., Kam E. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008. Vol. 47, № 3. P. 724–741.

Vogelaar B.M., Eijsbouts S., Bergwerff J.A., Heiszwolf J.J. // Catal. Today. 2010. Vol. 154, № 3/4. P. 256–263.

Centeno G., Ancheyta J., Alvarez A. et al. // Fuel. 2012. Vol. 100. P. 73–79.

Ancheyta-Juárez J., Aguilar-Rodrı́guez E., Salazar-Sotelo D. et al. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 1999. Vol. 180, № 1/2. P. 195–205.

Catalyst deactivation // Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis. 2007. Vol. 169. P. 141–216.

Absi-Halabi M., Stanislaus A., Trimm D.L. // Appl. Catal. 1991. Vol. 72, № 2. P. 193–215.

Sahoo S.K., Ray S.S., Singh I.D. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2004. Vol. 278, № 1. P. 83–91.

Snape C.E., Diaz M.C., Tyagi Y.R. et al. // Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis. 2001. Vol. 139. P. 359–365.

Rana M.S., Ancheyta J., Sahoo S.K., Rayo P. // Catal. Today. 2014. Vol. 220–222. P. 97–105.

Guichard B., Roy-Auberger M., Devers E. et al. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2009. Vol. 367, № 1/2. P. 1–8.

Hauser A., Stanislaus A., Marafi A., Al-Adwani A. // Fuel. 2005. Vol. 84, № 2/3. P. 259–269.

Deactivation and Regeneration // Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis. 1989. Vol. 51, № C. P. 339–346.

Wiwel P., Zeuthen P., Jacobsen A.C. // Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis. 1991. Vol. 68, № C. P. 257–264.

Callejas M.A., Martı́nez M.T., Blasco T., Sastre E. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2001. Vol. 218, № 1/2. P. 181–188.

Richardson S.M., Nagaishi H., Gray M.R. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996. Vol. 35, № 11. P. 3940–3950.

Furimsky E., Massoth F.E. // Catal. Rev. - Sci. Eng. 2005. Vol. 47, № 3. P. 297–489.

Beltramone A.R., Crossley S., Resasco D.E. et al. // Catal. Letters. 2008. Vol. 123, № 3/4. P. 181–185.

Robinson P. R., Dolbear G. E., Hydrotreating and Hydrocracking: Fundamentals // Practical Advances in Petroleum Processing / Ed. by C.S. Hsu, P.R. Robinson. New York, NY : Springer New York, 2006.

Rana M.S., Navarro R., Leglise J. // Catal. Today. 2004. Vol. 98, № 1/2 (Spec. Iss.) P. 67–74.

Logadóttir Á., Moses P.G., Hinnemann B. et al. // Catal. Today. 2006. Vol. 111, № 1/2. P. 44–51.

Cooper B.H., Knudsen K.G. Ultra Deep Desulfurization of Diesel: How an Understanding of the Underlying Kinetics can Reduce Investment Costs // ACS Division of Petroleum Chemistry, Inc. Preprints. New York, NY : Springer New York, 2001. Vol. 46, № 4. P. 338–340.

Dong D., Jeong S., Massoth F.E. // Catal. Today. 1997. Vol. 37, № 3. P. 267–275.

Scaroni A.W., Jenkins R.G., Utrilla J.R., Walker P.L. // Fuel Process. Technol. 1984. Vol. 9, № 1. P. 103–108.

Koide R., Iwanami Y., Konishi S. et al. // Fuel. 2015. Vol. 153. P. 455–463.

Sumbogo Murti S.D., Choi K.-H., Korai Y., Mochida I. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2005. Vol. 280, № 2. P. 133–139.

Budukva D.V., Klimov O.V., Pashigreva A.V. et al. // Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2010. Vol. 83, № 12. P. 2144–2151.

Ho T.C., Markley G.E. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2004. Vol. 267, № 1/2. P. 245–250.

Rana M.S., Al-Barood A., Brouresli R. et al. // Fuel Process. Technol. 2018. Vol. 177. P. 170–178.

Furimsky E. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013. Vol. 52, № 50. P. 17695–17713.

Furimsky E. // Catal. Rev. 1983. Vol. 25, № 3. P. 421–458.

Catalysis in the Refining of Fischer-Tropsch Syncrude. Cambridge : Royal Society of Chemistry, 2010.

Dabros T.M.H., Gaur A., Pintos D.G. et al. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2018. Vol. 551. P. 106–121.

Furimsky E. // Catal. Today. 2013. Vol. 217. P. 13–56.

Badawi M., Paul J.F., Cristol S. et al. // J. Catal. 2011. Vol. 282, № 1. P. 155–164.

Klimov O.V., Nadeina K.A., Dik P.P. et al. // Catal. Today. 2016. Vol. 271. P. 56–63.

Marroquín-Sánchez G., Ancheyta-Juárez J. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2001. Vol. 207, № 1/2. P. 407–420.

Mederos F.S. Rodríguez M.A., Ancheyta J., Arce E. // Energy and Fuels. 2006. Vol. 20, № 3. P. 936–945.

Gunjal P.R., Ranade V.V. // Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007. Vol. 62, № 18–20. P. 5512–5526.

Bukhtiyarova G.A., Vlasova E.N., Aleksandrov P.V. et al. // Catal. Ind. 2017. Vol. 9, № 3. P. 212–220.

Sadrameli S.M. // Fuel. 2016. Vol. 173. P. 285–297.

Chen X., Li T.,Xin L. et al. // Catal. Commun. 2016. Vol. 74. P. 95–98.

Stanislaus A., Marafi A., Rana M.S. // Catal. Today. 2010. Vol. 153, № 1. P. 1–68.

Kabe T., Qian W., Ishihara A. // Catal. Today. 1997. Vol. 39, № 1/2. P. 3–12.

Qian W., Ishihara A., Aoyama Y., Kabe T. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2000. Vol. 196, № 1. P. 103–110.

Vogelaar B.M., Steiner P., van der Zijden T.F et al. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2007. Vol. 318. P. 28–36.

Massoth F.E., Koltai T., Tétényi P. // J. Catal. 2001. Vol. 203, № 1. P. 33–40.

Topsøe H., Clausen B.S., Massoth F.E. Hydrotreating Catalysis // Catalysis. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1996. P. 1–269.

Kogan V.M. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2002. Vol. 237, № 1/2. P. 161–169.

Kogan V.M., Rozhdestvenskaya N.N., Korshevets I.K. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2002. Vol. 234, № 1/2. P. 207–219.

Dumeignil F., Paul J.-F., Veilly E. et al. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2005. Vol. 289, № 1. P. 51–58.

Paul J.F., Payen E. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2003. Vol. 107, № 17. P. 4057–4064.

Cristol S.. Paul J.F., Payen E. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2002. Vol. 106, № 22. P. 5659–5667.

Vogelaar B.M., Kagami N., van der Zijden T.F. et al. // J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2009. Vol. 309, № 1/2. P. 79–88.

Karroua M., Matralis H., Grange P., Delmon B. // J. Catal. 1993. Vol. 139, № 2. P. 371–374.

Eijsbouts S., van den Oetelaar L.C.A., Louwen J.N. et al. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. American Chemical Society, 2007. Vol. 46, № 12. P. 3945–3954.

Guichard B., Roy-Auberger M., Devers E. et al. // Catal. Today. 2008. Vol. 130, № 1. P. 97–108.

Günter J.R., Marks O., Korányi T.I., Paál Z. // Appl. Catal. 1988. Vol. 39, № C. P. 285–294.

Niemann W., Clausen B.S., Topsøe H. // Catal. Letters. 1990. Vol. 4, № 4–6. P. 355–363.

Zhao X.J., Wei J. // J. Catal. 1994. Vol. 147, № 2. P. 429–440.

Eijsbouts S., Li X., Bergwerff J. et al. // Catal. Today. 2017. Vol. 292. P. 38–50.

100

Eijsbouts S., Battiston A.A., van Leerdam G.C. // Catal. Today. 2008. Vol. 130, № 2–4. P. 361–373.

101

Надиров Н.К., Котова А.В., Камьянов В.Ф. Металлы в нефтях. Алма-Ата : Наука, 1984. 448 c.

102

Hirner A.V. // Metal Complexes in Fossil Fuels / Ed. by R.H. Filby, J.F. Branthaver. Washington, DC : American Chemical Society, 1987. ACS Symposium Series. Vol. 344. P. 146–153.

103

Stigter J.B., de Haan H.P.M., Guicherit R. et al. // Environ. Pollut. 2000. Vol. 107, № 3. P. 451–464.

104

Puri B.K., Irgolic K.J. // Environ. Geochem. Health. 1989. Vol. 11, № 3/4. P. 95–99.

105

Free H.H. Catalyst Deactivation [HVGO’s and lighter feeds] // Akzo Nobel Catal. Cour. № 17.

106

Ng C.F., Ye H., She L. et al. Arsenic poisoning of nickel catalysts for the adsorption of ethene // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 1998. Vol. 171, № 2. P. 293–299.

107

Nielsen B., Villadsen J. // Appl. Catal. 1984. Vol. 11, № 1. P. 123–138.

108

Jallais A., Thomas M., Hugon A., Bezverkhyy I. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2021. Vol. 610. Article 117958.

109

Maurice V., Ryndin Yu.A., Bergeret G. et al. // J. Catal. 2001. Vol. 204, № 1. P. 192–199.

110

Ryndin Yu.A., Candy J.P., Didillon B. et al. // J. Catal. 2001. Vol. 198, № 1. P. 103–108.

111

Siegel J., Olsen C. Feed contaminants in hydroprocessing units [Electronic resource]. Chicago, 2008. P. 2–6. URL: https://paperzz.com/doc/8120426/feed-contaminants-in-hydroprocessing-units

112

Britto J.M., Reboucas M. V., Bessa I. // Hydrocarb. Process. 2010. Vol. 89, № 10. P. 65–69.

113

Olsen C. AT734G: A combined silicon and arsenic guard catalyst // ART Catalagram Spec. Ed. 2010. № 108. P. 9–13.

114

Puig-Molina A., Nielsen L.P., Molenbroek A.M., Herbst K. // Catal. Letters. 2004. Vol. 92, № 1/2. P. 29–34.

115

S. Eijsbouts, Mayo S., Burns L., Anderson G. Deactivation of Hydrotreating Catalysts in Different Reaction Zones of a VGO FCC-Pretreatment Reactor. XV Foro de Avances de la Industria de Refinación Mexico City, September 2009.

116

Камьянов В.Ф., Аксенов В.С., Титов В.И. Гетероатомные компоненты нефтей. Новосибирск : Наука, 1983. 238 с.

117

Camino G., Lomakin S.., Lazzari M. // Polymer (Guildf). 2001. Vol. 42, № 6. P. 2395–2402.

118

Chainet F., Le Meur L., Lienemann C.-P. et al. // Fuel. 2013. Vol. 111. P. 519–527.

119

Nadeina K.A., Kazakov M.O., Kovalskaya A.A. et al. Guard bed catalysts for silicon removal during hydrotreating of middle distillates // Catal. Today. 2019. Vol. 329. P. 53–62.

120

Grading innovation helps you deal with changing market requirements [Electronic resource]. 2019. URL: https://blog.topsoe.com/grading-innovation-helps-you-deal-with-changing-market-requirements (accessed: 19.11.2019).

121

Vaiss V.S., Fonseca C.G., Antunes F.P.N. et al. // J. Catal. 2020. Vol. 389. P. 578–591.

122

He H., Lu P., Wu L. et al. // Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016. Vol. 11, № 1. P. 330.

123

Wang S., Tu J., Yuan Y. et al. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016. Vol. 18, № 4. P. 3204–3213.

124

Schmidt M., Rasmussen H. // Pet. Technol. Q. 2016. Vol. 21, № 2. P. 19–24.

125

Xiao T.-C., Su J.-X., Wang H.-T. et al. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000. Vol. 39, № 10. P. 3679–3687.

126

Reynolds J.G. // Pet. Sci. Technol. 2001. Vol. 19, № 7/8. P. 979–1007.

127

Zhao X., Xu C., Shi Q. // Structure and Bonding. 2016. Vol. 168. P. 39–70.

128

Kobayashi S., Kushiyama S., Aizawa R. et al. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1987. Vol. 26, № 11. P. 2241–2245.

129

Hadebe S.W., Leckel D. // Energy and Fuels. 2013. Vol. 27, № 9. P. 5161–5167.

130

Joshi U., Schneider A. // Pet. Technol. Q. 2016. Vol. 21, № 1. P. 65–69.

131

Zeinalov E.B., Abbasov V.M., Alieva L.I. // Pet. Chem. 2009. Vol. 49, № 3. P. 185–192.

132

Robinson P.R., Dolbear G.E. // Springer Handbook of Petroleum Technology / Ed. by Chang Samuel Hsu, P.R. Robinson. 2017. P. 713–776.

133

Grading and Guard materials maximum catalyst protection and optimum pressure drop management [Electronic resource]. URL: https://cdn.digitalrefining.com/data/literature/file/736283926.pdf (accessed: 28.01.2020).

134

Gray M.R., Srinivasan N., Masliyah J.H. // Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2002. Vol. 80, № 3. P. 346–354.

135

Weber S. The structural integrity of insert parts of high pressure hydrotreating reactor // Dillinger Pressure Vessel Colloquium on 24th. Dillinger, 2003. P. 1–12.

136

Dunleavy J. // Platinum Met. Rev. 2005. Vol. 49, № 3. P. 156.

137

Perez M.J.L. et al. Avoiding unplanned reactor shutdowns // Pet. Technol. Q. 2019. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 47–53.

138

McCulloch D.C. Catalytic Hydrotreating in Petroleum Refining // Applied Industrial Catalysis. Elsevier, 1983. Vol. 1. P. 69–121.

139

Leliveld B., Toshima H. // Pet. Technol. Q. 2015. Vol. 20, № 1. P. 77–83.

140

How fouling abatement solutions can unlock millions of dollars per year from your reactor [Electronic resource]. URL: http://gpc-whitepapers.com/uploads/media/fouling_abatement_white_paper_FINAL.pdf (accessed: 19.01.2021).

141

Moyse B. Ring-shaped catalysts make the grade // Pet. Technol. Q. 2010. Vol. 15, № 2. P. 25–29.

142

Mik I.A., Klenov O.P., Kazakov M.O. et al. // Fuel. 2021. Vol. 285. Article 119149.

143

Carlson K., Foshee T. Capturing value through integrated improvements at the FCC-PT–FCC complex [Electronic resource]. URL: https://cdn.digitalrefining.com/data/articles/file/1002481-sheGBPGBP-juGBP-white-20.pdf (accessed: 19.01.2021).

144

Manna U. Ultra low sulfur HSD production - CENTERATM catalysts are key to unlock potential of hydrotreaters // International Conference on «Refining Chalenges — Way forward». New Delhi, India, 2012.

145

Надеина К.А. Новые подходы к синтезу высокоактивных и высокопрочных Co-Mo катализаторов гидроочистки : дис. … канд. хим. наук / Ин-т орган. химии им. Н.Д. Зелинского РАН. М., 2015.

146

Никульшин П.В. Молекулярный дизайн катализаторов гидроочистки на основе гетерополисоединений, хелатонов и зауглероженных носителей : дис. … д-ра хим. наук / Ин-т орган. химии им. Н.Д. Зелинского РАН. М., 2015.

147

«Роснефть» полностью перешла на катализаторы гидроочистки собственной разработки [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.rosneft.ru/press/news/item/206721/.

148

«Газпромнефть – Каталитические системы» [Electronic resource]. URL: https://catalysts.gazprom-neft.ru/.

149

«Газпром нефть» успешно испытала на Омском НПЗ первый отечественный катализатор гидроочистки [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.gazprom-neft.ru/press-center/news/gazprom-neft-uspeshno-ispytala-na-omskom-npz-pervyy-otechestvennyy-katalizator-gidroochistki/.

150

Battiston A. et al. New catalysts for low and medium pressure hydrotreating // Pet. Technol. Q. 2019. Vol. 24, № 3. P. 33–39.

151

Zeuthen P. A new generation of catalyst is born: TK-6001 HySwell [Electronic resource]. URL: https://cdn.digitalrefining.com/data/articles/file/1468570709.pdf (accessed: 19.01.2021).

152

Leliveld B., Slettenhaar B. CELESTIATM: a revolutionary new hydroprocessing catalyst providing ultra-high activity // Albemarle Catalyst Courier. 2019. № 89. P. 9–23.

153

Kelkar A. // Hydrocarb. Engineering. 2019. Vol. 24, № 9. P. 39–42.

154

Battiston A. Kinetic engine drives catalyst development // Pet. Technol. Q. 2016. Vol. 21, № 2. P. 35–41.

155

STAX TECHNOLOGY [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.albemarle.com/businesses/refining-solutions/hydroprocessing-catalysts/stax-technology.

156

Get the best out of a hydrocracker unit with new EQUIFLOW® internal reactors [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.axens.net/blog/business-news/get-the-best-out-of-a-hydrocracker-unit-with-new-equiflow-internal-reactors/ (accessed: 20.01.2021).

157

Filter trays vital to onstream streak [Electronic resource]. URL: https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/3433801/Content Library/Shell Filter Trays Vital To Onstream Streak Case Study (Shell Martinez).pdf (accessed: 20.01.2021).

158

Advancing pressure drop mitigation through collaboration [Electronic resource]. URL: http://gpc-whitepapers.com/uploads/media/UOP-Crystaphase-AdvancingPressureDropMitigationThroughCollaboration-FINAL.pdf (accessed: 20.01.2021).

159

Diekmann E. Catalysis q&a: What impact does catalyst packing have on unit performance and how do we achieve the best packing arrangement? // Pet. Technol. Q. 2018. Vol. 23, № 2. P. 14.

160

More efficient catalyst loading [Electronic resource]. 2017. URL: https://cdn.digitalrefining.com/data/articles/file/433538640.pdf (accessed: 26.01.2021).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.