Conversion of ethylene to propylene over NiO-MoO3/Al2O3 catalyst

The effect of operating conditions of ethylene conversion to propylene on the yield of products, activity and stability of NiO-MoO₃/Al₂O₃ catalyst was studied. The catalytic tests were carried out in a fixed-bed flow reactor at temperatures of 100-250 °C, atmospheric pressure and weight hourly space velocity of 0.25-2 h^-1. The maximum propylene yield of 57 wt.% is achieved at 150 °C and 0.25 h^-1. Under these conditions the degree of ethylene conversion reaches 90 %. The kinetic model for the process has been proposed, which described the formation of the main reaction products. It has been shown that carbonaceous deposits are formed on the catalyst surface during the ethylene conversion. The amount of these deposits increases with increasing temperature and contact time. Moreover some Mo species change the oxidation state from +6 to +4/+5.

1. Vogt E.T.C., Whiting G.T., Chowdhury A.D., Weckhuysen B.M. // Advances in Catalysis. 2015. V. 58. P. 143–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acat.2015.10.001.

2. Kianfar E., Hajimirzaee S., Mousavian S., Mehr A.S. // Microchem. J. 2020. V. 156. P. 104822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2020.104822.

3. Mol J.C., van Leeuwen P.W.N.M. Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2008. P. 3240–3256.

4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527610044.hetcat0164/

5. Jan O., Song K., Dichiara A.B., Resende F.L.P. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018. V. 57. № 31. P. 10241–10250. https://doi.org/ 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b01902/

6. Седов И.В., Макарян И.А., Берзигияров П.К., Магомедова М.В., Максимов А.Л. // Журнал прикладной химии. 2018. Т. 91. № 12. С. 1693–1707.

7. Speight J.G. Handbook of Industrial Hydrocarbon Processes. Gulf Professional Publishing, 2020. 143–192 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809923-0.00004-7.

8. Bao J., Yang G., Yoneyama Y., Tsubaki N. // ACS Catal. 2019. V. 9. № 4. P. 3026–3053. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b03924/

9. Mohsenzadeh A., Zamani A., Taherzadeh M.J. // ChemBioEng Rev. 2017. V. 4. № 2. P. 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.201600025.

10. US Patent 8395005, опубл. 12.03.2013.

11. Патент РФ 2383522, опубл. 10.03.2010.

12. Li L., Palcheva R.D., Jens K.J. // Top. Catal. 2013. V. 56. P. 783–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-013-0036-z.

13. Булучевский Е.А., Михайлова М.С., Лавренов А.В. // Химия в интересах устойчивого развития. 2013. №1. С. 55–59.

14. Сайфулина Л.Ф., Булучевский Е.А., Лавренов А.В. // Журнал Сибирского федерального университета, серия "Химия". 2014. Т. 7, № 4. С. 526–535.

15. Булучевский Е.А., Карпова Т.Р., Сайфулина Л.Ф., Лавренов А.В. // Российский химический журнал. 2018. Т. LXII. №1–2. С.110–116. https://doi.org/10.6060/rcj.2018621-2.8.

16. Karpova T.R., Buluchevskiy E.A., Moiseenko M.A., Lavrenov A.V., Arbuzov A.B. // AIP Conference Proceedings. 2019. V. 2143. P. 020024. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5122923

17. US Patent 3689589, опубл. 5.09.1972.

18. Karpova T., Buluchevskiy E., Lavrenov A., Moiseenko M., Trenikhin M., Arbuzov A., Gulyaeva T., Savelyeva G., Muromtsev I. // Mol. Catal. 2021. V. 499. P. 111316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2020.111316.

19. Карпова Т.Р., Булучевский Е.А., Лавренов А.В., Моисеенко М.А., Арбузов А.Б., Гуляева Т.И., Юрпалов В.Л. // Катализ в промышленности. 2021. Т. 21. № 3. С. 154–162. https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0387-2021-3-154-162.

20. Alvarado Perea L., Felischak M., Wolff T., López Gaona J.A., Hamel C., Seidel-Morgenstern A. // Fuel. 2021. V. 284. P. 119031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119031.

21. Булучевский Е.А., Лавренов А.В., Сайфулина Л.Ф. // Журнал Сибирского федерального университета, серия “Химия.” 2014. Т. 3, № 7. С. 424–430.

22. Булучевский Е.А., Лавренов А.В., Сайфулина Л.Ф. // Химия в интересах устойчивого развития. 2014. Т. 22. С. 561–567.

23. https://cccbdb.nist.gov/

24. Loman T.E., Ma Y., Ilin V., Gowda S., Korsbo N., Yewale N., Rackauckas C., Isaacson S.A. // PLOS Computat.Biol. 2023. Oct 18;19(10):e1011530. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011530.

25. Ma Y., Gowda S., Anantharaman R., Laughman C., Shah V., Rackauckas C. arXiv:2103.05244. 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.05244.

26. Rackauckas C., Nie Q. // Journal of Open Research Software. 2017. V. 5. № 1. P. 15. https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.151.

27. Mogensen P.K., Riseth A.N. // Journal of Open Source Software. 2018. V. 3. № 24. P. 615. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00615.

28. Martínez A., Arribas M.A., Concepción P., Moussa S. // Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2013. V. 467. P. 509–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2013.08.021.

29. Koninckx E., Mendes P.S.F., Thybaut J.W., Broadbelt L.J. // Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2021. V. 624, P. 118296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2021.118296.

30. Finiels A., Fajula F., Hulea V. // Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014. V 4. № 8. P. 2412–2426. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CY00305E.

31. Lu K., Jin F., Wu G., Ding Y. // Sustain. Energy Fuels. 2019. V. 3. № 12. P. 3569–3581. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SE00771G.

32. Nikolova D., Edreva-Kardjieva R., Giurginca M., Meghea A., Vakros J., Voyiatzis G.A., Kordulis C. // Vib. Spectrosc. 2007. V. 44. № 2. P. 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vibspec.2007.03.002.

33. Garbarino G., Campodonico S., Perez A.R., Carnasciali M.M., Riani P., Finocchio E., Busca G. // Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2013. V. 452. P. 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2012.10.039.

34. Morales-Ortuño J.C., Klimova T.E. // Fuel. 2017. V. 198. P. 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.01.007.

35. Budukva S.V., Klimov O.V., Chesalov Y.A., Prosvirin I.P., Larina T.V., Noskov A.S. // Catal. Lett. 2018. V. 148. P. 1525–1534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-018-2365-9.

36. Tian H., Roberts C.A., Wachs I.E. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2010. V. 114. № 33. P. 14110–14120. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp103269w.

37. Aritani H., Tanaka T., Funabiki T., Yoshida S., Eda K., Sotani N., Kudo M., Hasegawa S. // J. Phys. Chem. 1996. V. 100. № 50. P. 19495–19501. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9615464.