Buy (625 RUB)
|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
Comparative Analysis of Reactivity of Aspen Wood in Enzymatic Hydrolysis in Dependence on its Pre-treatment in Aqueous and Aqueous-organic Solutions of Sulfuric and Nitric Ac
https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0387-2015-5-67-73
Abstract
Various methods for pretreatment of aspen wood were studied. The methods included the pretreatment of the wood with aqueous solutions of sulfuric and nitric acids and with water-organic (ethanol, butanol) solution of sulfuric acid (organosolvent). The effect of the methods on the conversion of raw material into simple sugars during the enzymatic hydrolysis was comparatively studied. The effects of temperature, acid concentration, composition of the organic phase (for sulfuric acid), and pressure (for nitric acid) on the pretreatment efficiency are analyzed. It is shown that the use of organosolvent of 0,5 % sulfuric acid allows one to increase the reactivity of ground aspen wood by 3–4 times as compared with that of the feedstock. The most effective pretreatment was found to be the pretreatment in a 4,8 % aqueous solution of nitric acid (125 °C, 1,8 MPa, 60 min), which increases the reactivity of ground aspen wood more than by 5 times.
About the Authors
G.S. Dotsenko
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D.O. Osipov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I.N. Zorov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A.P. Sinitsyn
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Букштынов А.Д., Грошев Б.И., Крылов Г.В. // Леса. М.: Мысль, 1981. 316 с.
2. Рубки и восстановление леса // Сб. науч. тр. ВНИИ лесоводства и механизации лесн. хоз-ва. М.: ВНИИЛМ, 1980. 120 с.
3. Johansson T. // Biomass and Bioenergy. 2002. Vol. 23. P. 245—255.
4. Zhu J.Y., Gleisner R., Scott C.T., Luo X.L., Tian S. // Bioresource Technol. 2011. Vol. 102. P. 8921—8929.
5. Goshadrou A., Karimi K., Lefsrud M. // Carbohydrate Polymers. 2013. Vol. 96. P. 440— 449.
6. Доценко Г.С., Чекушина А.В., Кондратьева Е.Г., Правильников А.Г., Андрианов Р.М.,Осипов Д.О., Синицына О.А., Короткова О.Г., Степанов В.И., Новожилов Е.В., Ачильдиев Е.Р., СиницынА.П. // Лесной вестник. 2012. No 8. C. 129—135.
7. Азаров В.И., Буров А.В., Оболенская А.В. // Химия древесины и синтетических полимеров. Санкт-Петербург: СПбЛТА, 1999. 628 c.
8. Conde-Mejíaa C., Jiménez-Gutiérreza A., El-Halwagi M. // Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2012. Vol. 90. P. 18 9 —2 0 2 .
9. Alvira P., Tomás-PejóE., Ballesteros M., Negro M.J. // Bioresource Technol. 2010. Vol. 101. P. 4851—4861.
10. Eggeman T., Elander R.T. // Bioresource Technol. 2005. Vol. 96. P. 2 01 9 —2 0 2 5 .
11. Papatheofanous M.G., Billa E., Koullas D.P., Monties B., Koukios E.G. // Bioresource Technol. 1995. Vol. 54. P. 305—310.
12. Park N., Kim H., Koo B., Yeo H., Choi I. Organosolv pretreatment with various catalysts for enhancing enzymatic hydrolysis of pitch pine (Pinus rigida) // Bioresource Technol. 2010. Vol. 101. P. 7 0 4 6 —7 0 53 .
13. Hendriks A.T.W.M., Zeeman G. // Bioresourсe Technol. 2009. Vol. 100. P. 10—18.
14. Wyman C.E. // Handbook on bioethanol: production and utilization. Washington DC. Taylor and Francis. 1996. 442 p.
15. Brodeur G., Yau E., Badal K., Collier J., Ramachandran K.B., Ramakrishnan S. // EnzymeResearch. 2011. Vol. 2011. doi:10.4061/2011/787532. 17 p.
16. Синицын А.П., Гусаков А.В., Черноглазов В.М. // Биоконверсия лигноцеллюлоных материалов. М.: Изд-во МГУ, 1995. 224 с.
17. Ghose T.K. // Pure Appl. Chem. 1987. Vol. 59. P. 257—268.
18. Досон Р., Эллиот Д., Эллиот У., Джонс К.// Справочник биохимика. М.: Мир. 1991. C. 464.
19. Mosier N., Wyman C.E., Dale B.D., Elander R.T., Lee Y.Y., Holtzapple M., Ladisch C.M. // Bioresource Technol. 2005. Vol. 96. P. 673—686.
20. Zhao X., Cheng K., Liu D. // Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009. Vol. 82. P. 815—827.
21. Sahoo S., Seydibeyoglu M.O., Mohanty A.K., Misra M. // Biomass and bioenergy. 2011. Vol. 35. P. 42 30—4237.
22. Vinardell M.P., Ugartondo V., Mitjans M. // Industrial crops and products. 2008. Vol. 27. P. 220—223.
23. Thring, R. W., Chorent E., Overend R. // Biomass. 1990. Vol. 23. P. 2 8 9 —3 0.
Review
For citations:
Dotsenko G., Osipov D., Zorov I., Sinitsyn A. Comparative Analysis of Reactivity of Aspen Wood in Enzymatic Hydrolysis in Dependence on its Pre-treatment in Aqueous and Aqueous-organic Solutions of Sulfuric and Nitric Ac. Kataliz v promyshlennosti. 2015;15(5):67-73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0387-2015-5-67-73
Views:
708
Email this article 