Preview

Kataliz v promyshlennosti

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Bifunctional Zeolite- and Aluminophosphate-Based Catalysts for Hydrocracking and Hydroisodeparaffinization. Part 1. The Influence of the Nature and Activity of the Hydrogenating and Acidic Components on the Activity and Selectivity of Hydrocracking Cataly

https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0387-2019-3-235-239

Abstract

Sulfur resistance of nickel, platinum and palladium metals on acid supports was studied depending on the support nature. Catalysts comprising nickel, platinum, palladium metals and sulfides as hydro-dehydrogenating components were examined for hydrocracking of n-octane. HY, ZSM-5, ZSM-23, ZSM-12, as well as silicoaluminophosphates SAPO-11 and SAPO-31 were used as the supports. The sulfur resistance of the supported metals in the catalysts was shown different and independent of the properties of the acidic support under the reaction conditions. Hydrocracking follows two different pathways depending on the activity and nature of the hydro-, dehydrogenating component (a metal or the sulfide), as well as on the ratio of activities of the acidic and hydrogenating components. The first pathway is preferable cracking of the initial paraffin at the early stage, and the second is dehydrogenation of the initial paraffin.

About the Author

G. V. Echevsky
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Novosibirsk
Russian Federation


References

1. Raseev S. Thermal and catalytic processes in petroleum refining. New York: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, 2003. 936 p.

2. Speight J.G. Chapter 9 — Hydrocracking. The Refinery of the Future. Elsevier. — Boston: William Andrew publishing, 2011. P. 275-313.

3. Gosselink J.W. Transition Metal Sulphides: Chemistry and Catalysis. T. Weber, R. Prins and R.A. van Santen (Editors), Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1998. P. 311.

4. Bricker M., Thakkar V., Petri J. Hydrocracking in Petroleum Processing. Handbook of Petroleum Processing. 2015. P. 317-360.

5. Gruia A. Recent advances in hydrocracking. In book Practical Advances in Petroleum Processing. Springer, 2006. P. 217-256.

6. Weisz Р.В. // Advances in Catalysis. V. 13. 1962. P. 137-190.

7. Lone K.G., Salakhutdinov N.F. Perspectives of catalysis on zeolities in solution of environmental problems. In book «Chemistry, ecology and health». Nova Science Publishers Inc., 1995. P. 65-68.

8. Ландау М.В., Кругликов В.Я. Труды Всесоюзного совещания «Катализ реакций сернистых соединений». Т. 2. Новосибирск, 1979. С. 108.

9. Dalla Betta R.A., Boudart M. Proc. Fifth Intern. Congress on Catalysis, Miami Beach, Fla., 1972, North-Holland Publ. Co., 1973. V. 2. P. 1329.

10. Чукин Г.Д., Ландау М.В., Кругликов В.Я., Агиевский Д.А. / I Всесоюзная конференция «Применение цеолитов в катализе», Новосибирск, 1976. Т. 2. с. 66.

11. Simon L.J, van Ommen J.G., Jentys A., Lercher J.A. // J. Catal. 2001. V. 201. P. 60-69.

12. Cooper B.H., Donnis. B.B.L. // Appl. Catal., A: General. 1996. V. 137. P. 203-223.

13. Pawelec B., Mariscal R., Navarro R.M., Bokhorst S., Rojasa S., Fierro J.L.G. // Appl. Catal. A: General. 2002. V. 225. P. 223-237.

14. Yoshimura Y., Toba M., Matsui T., Harada M., Ichihashi Y., Bando K.K., Yasuda H., Ishihara H., Morita Y., Kameoka T. // Appl. Catal. A: General. 2007. V. 322. P. 152-171.

15. US Patent 3943053. 1976.

16. Романников В.Н., Ионе К.Г., Орлова Л.Б., Ждан П.А. / IV Советско-Французский семинар по катализу, Тбилиси, 1978. С. 136.


Review

For citations:


Echevsky G.V. Bifunctional Zeolite- and Aluminophosphate-Based Catalysts for Hydrocracking and Hydroisodeparaffinization. Part 1. The Influence of the Nature and Activity of the Hydrogenating and Acidic Components on the Activity and Selectivity of Hydrocracking Cataly. Kataliz v promyshlennosti. 2019;19(3):235-239. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0387-2019-3-235-239

Views: 861


ISSN 1816-0387 (Print)
ISSN 2413-6476 (Online)