Physico-chemical aspects of photocatalytic destruction of cationic and anionic organic dyes in the presence of ions: Na+, Cl-, HCO3-
https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0387-2026-1-98-108
Abstract
The influence of the concentration of Na+, Cl-, HCO3- ions on the efficiency of photocatalytic destruction of model organic dyes is considered: cationic - methylene blue (MB); anionic - methyl orange (MO). Using monthly monitoring of hydrochemical parameters of polluted rivers of urbanized areas (Khabarovsk, Russia) during 2023, it is shown that the concentration of ions varies in the ranges: 10–450 mg/l for HCO3-; 13–180 mg/l for Na+; 1–360 mg/l for Cl-. The kinetics of photodestruction of model pollutants was studied at concentrations of the studied ions of 0, 1, 10, 100, 1000, 10000 mg/l (for crystalline substance) using the reference photocatalyst titanium dioxide (P25). The photodestruction time (t) was estimated at different values of the conversion degree (α) of model pollutants at: initial – 10%t; middle – 50%t; final – 90%t stages of the photocatalytic process. The pseudo-first-order reaction rate constants were calculated on the linear section of the kinetic curves. The effect of the concentration of Na+, Cl-, HCO3- ions on the degree of titanium dioxide dispersion was studied based on the turbidity values of the photocatalytic solution at the dark stage.
About the Author
A. V. ZaitsevRussian Federation
References
1. Hassimi A. H., Mohd H. M., Nur 'Izzati I. // Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2020. V. 33. P. 101035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101035
2. Gregory U. S., Nwachukwu A. N., Bridget N. I. // Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2025. V. 494. P. 138508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138508
3. Ravindra S., Alok S. // Journal of Environmental Management. 2025. V. 377. P. 124663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124663
4. Панченко В.Н., Зубкова Е.Ю., Тимофеева М.Н. // Катализ в промышленности. 2024. № 5. Т. 24. С. 81-96. https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0387-2024-5-81-96
5. Сериков T. M., Ибраев Н. Х., Иванова Т. М., Савилов С. В. // Журнал прикладной химии. 2021. Т. 94. №. 4 С. 445-452. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044461821040034
6. Karthikeyan C., Prabhakarn A., Ramachandran K., Abdullah M. A., Karuppuchamy S. // Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2020. V. 828. P. 154281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154281
7. Чебаненко М. И., Захарова Н. В., Попков В. И. // Журнал прикладной химии. 2020. Т. 93. № 4 С. 490-497 https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044461820040039
8. Zaitsev A. V., Astapov I. A. // Materials Letters. 2022. V. 310. P. 131509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.131509
9. Parul, Kamalpreet K., Rahul B., Prit P. S., Sandeep K. // Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2020. V. 8. Is. 2. P. 103666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.103666
10. Xinyang X., Yingguan X., Rui Z., Zhengliang Y., Hassaan A. B., Manni L., Zeyu W. // Ceramics International. 2025. V.51. Is.10. P. 13586-13596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.01.203
11. Riaz S., Park S.J. // Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2020. Vol. 84. P. 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2019.12.021
12. Mariana de Souza P., Rafaela P. M., Gécica C. B., Renata M. B., Fábio E., Adriano M. B. // Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry. 2023. Vol. 435. P. 114304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2022.114304
13. Dong-Eun L., Mo-Keun K., Mohtaram D., Wan-Kuen J. // Catalysis Communications. 2023. Vol. 183. P. 106764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2023.106764
14. Зайцев А.В., Шестеркин В.П., Шестеркина Н.М., Андреева Д.В., Ионкин К.В. // Химия в интересах устойчивого развития. 2024. Т. 32. № 4. С. 415-427. https://doi.org/10.15372/KhUR2024571
15. Devagi K., Cherie A. M., Beverley D. G., Michael O. // Chemosphere. 2015. V. 139. 2015, P. 579-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.07.070
16. Han H., Haixuan Z., Ya C., Yujia C., Li Z., Huase O. // Chemical Engineering Journal. 2019. V. 368. P. 273-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.190
17. Mai L. T., Chun-Chieh F., Ruey-Shin J. // Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2019. V. 276. P. 32-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.11.155
18. Shi-Lin Z., Shuai Z., Fang L., Jun-Jun L., Jing-Jing X., De-Jun Y., Chang-Tang C. // Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry. 2016. V. 328. P. 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.03.037
19. Petin A. N., Lebedeva M. G., Crimean O. V. Analysis and assessment of the quality of surface waters // Belgorod: Publishing House of BelSU. 2006. P.252
20. Dulian P., Nachit W., Jaglarz J., Zięba P., Kanak J., Żukowski W. // Optical Materials. 2019. V. 90. P. 264-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2019.02.041
21. Zhanying M., Linlin H., Xiaobo L., Lingjuan D., Guang F., Yangqing H. // Ceramics International. 2019. V. 45. Is. 13. P. 15824-15833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.05.085
Review
For citations:
Zaitsev A.V. Physico-chemical aspects of photocatalytic destruction of cationic and anionic organic dyes in the presence of ions: Na+, Cl-, HCO3-. Kataliz v promyshlennosti. 2026;26(1):98-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0387-2026-1-98-108
JATS XML



















