Buy (625 RUB)
|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
Transformations of ethane and ethylene with methane on a resistive fechral catalyst in the presence of hydrogen
https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0387-2021-1-2-62-66
Abstract
Transformations of methane-ethane, methane-ethylene, hydrogen-ethane and hydrogen-ethylene mixtures on an electrically heated resistive fechral catalyst were studied. During the transformations, the catalyst surface becomes covered with graphitic carbon deposits, which exertan additional catalytic action leading to the formation of C3 and C4 hydrocarbons. The formation of the indicated hydrocarbons proceeds most likely with the involvement of ethylene produced from ethane. The presence of hydrogen suppresses coking of the catalyst surface and decreases the yields of C3 and C4 hydrocarbons.
About the Authors
A. R. Osipov
Center of New Chemical Technologies BIC SB RAS, Omsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. A. Sidorchik
Center of New Chemical Technologies BIC SB RAS, Omsk; Omsk State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. A. Borisov
Center of New Chemical Technologies BIC SB RAS, Omsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. L. Temerev
Center of New Chemical Technologies BIC SB RAS, Omsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. A. Shlyapin
Center of New Chemical Technologies BIC SB RAS, Omsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Christian Enger B., Lødeng R., Holmen A. // Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2008. V. 346. P. 1—27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2008.05.018
2. Holmen A. // Catal. Today 2009. V. 142. P. 2—8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2009.01.004
3. Gao Z., Zhang J., Wang R. // J. Nat. Gas Chem. 2008. V. 17. P. 238—241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-9953(08)60057-2
4. Dedov A.G., Loktev A.S., Moiseev I.I., Aboukais A., Lamonier J-F., Filimonov I.N. // Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2003. V. 245. P. 209—220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00641-5
5. Gambo Y., Jalil A.A., Triwahyono S., Abdulrasheed A.A. // J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2018. V. 59. P. 218—229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.10.027
6. Fang T., Yeh C. // J. Catal. 1981. V. 69. P. 227—229. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(81)90149-4
7. Aparicio L.M., Rossini S.A., Sanfilippo D.G., Rekoske J.E., Trevino A.A., Dumesic J.A. // Ind. & Eng. Chem. Res. 2002. V. 30. P. 2114—2123. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00057a009
8. Sokolovskii V.D., Aliev S.M., Buyevskaya O.V., Davydov A.A. // Catal. Today 1989. V. 4. P. 293—300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-5861(89)85025-4
9. Fujimoto K., Sekine Y. // Natural Gas Conversion IV V. 107. P. 63—66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(97)80317-5
10. Sekine Y., Fujimoto K. // Energy & Fuels 1996. V. 10. P. 1278—1279. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef960009f
11. Sigaeva S.S., Anoshkina E.A., Temerev V.L., Osipov A.R., Shlyapin D.A. // AIP Conference Proceedings. 2019. V. 2143. P. 020043-1 — 020043-6. DOI: 10.1063/1.5122942.
12. Sigaeva S.S., Anoshkina E.A., Osipov A.R., Temerev V.L., Shlyapin D.A., Lavrenov A.V. // AIP Conference Proceedings. 2019. V. 2143. P. 020049-1—020049-5. DOI: 10.1063/1.5122948.
13. Sigaeva S.S., Tsyrul’nikov P.G., Shlyapin D.A., Dorofeeva T.S., Voitenko N.N., Vershinin V.I., Davletkil’deev N.A., Kuznetsov G.B., Kanashenko S.L. // Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2009. V. 82. P. 307—311. DOI: 10.1134/s1070427209020268.
14. Sigaeva S.S., Temerev V.L., Borisov V.A., Tsyrul’nikov P.G. // Catal. Ind. 2015. V. 7. P. 171—174. DOI: 10.1134/S2070050415030101.
15. Borisov V.A., Sigaeva S.S., Tsyrul’nikov P.G., Trenikhin M.V., Leont’eva N.N., Slepterev A.A., Kan V.E., Biryukov M.Y. // Kinet. Catal. 2014. V. 55. P. 319—326. DOI: 10.1134/s002315841403001x.
16. Pogosyan N.M., Pogosyan M.D., Strekova L.N., Tavadyan L.A., Arutyunov V.S. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015. V. 9. P. 218—222. DOI: 10.1134/S1990793115020104.
17. Pogosyan N.M., Pogosyan M.D., Shapovalova O.V., Nikitin A.V., Arutyunov V.S. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 2016. V. 10. P. 907—911. DOI: 10.1134/S1990793116060075.
18. Sun Q., Tang Y., R Gavalas G. // Energy Fuels 2000. V. 14. P. 490—494. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef9901995
19. Fleys M., Simon Y., Marquaire P-M. // J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2007. V. 79. P. 259—267. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef0602729
20. Fleys M., Shan W., Simon Y., Marquaire P.M. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007. V. 46. P. 1063—1068. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie060342z
21. Holmen A., Olsvik O., Rokstad O.A. // Fuel Process. Technol. 1995. V. 42. P. 249—267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3820(94)00109-7
22. Bistolfi M., Fornasari G., Molinari M., Palmery S., Dente M., Ranzi E. // Chem. Eng. Sci. 1992. V. 47. P. 2647—2652. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(92)87107-2
23. Sofranko J.A., Leonard J.J., Jones C.A. // J. Catal. 1987. V. 103. P. 302—310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(87)90122-9
24. Muradov N. // Catal. Commun. 2001. V. 2. P. 89—94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1566-7367(01)00013-9
25. Lee E.K., Lee S.Y., Han G.Y., Lee B.K., Lee T-J., Jun J.H., Yoon K.J. // Carbon N. Y. 2004. V. 42. P. 2641—2648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2004.06.003
Review
For citations:
Osipov A.R., Sidorchik I.A., Borisov V.A., Temerev V.L., Shlyapin D.A. Transformations of ethane and ethylene with methane on a resistive fechral catalyst in the presence of hydrogen. Kataliz v promyshlennosti. 2021;1(1-2):62-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0387-2021-1-2-62-66
Views:
609
Email this article 