Comparison Analysis of the Composition and Properties of Fodder Enzyme Preparations

The composition and properties of a wide range of domestic and foreign enzyme preparations (EP), used as additives to feeds of farm animals and poultry, are analyzed. The content of the main active enzymes – endoglucanases (beta-glucanases), cellobiohydrolases and xylanases, leading to biocatalytic destruction of non-starch polysaccharides, which are anti-nutritional factors of feeds and causing their incomplete digestion, is determined. It is shown that, based on the data on the component composition and the level of different types of activity, the studied enzyme preparations can be divided into three groups: a) with high xylanase and low cellulase (endoglucanase and cellobiohydrolase) content, b) high cellulase and low xylanase content, c) containing cellobiohydrolases, endoglucanases and xylanases in a different ratio, but without significant predominant of any of these enzymes. The ability of EP to reduce the viscosity of water-soluble non-starch polysaccharides – xylans and beta-glucans- has been studied. Among the enzyme preparations that have xylanase in their composition and belong to groups b) and c), a number of preparations have been determined which, at the same dosage according to xylanase activity, most effectively reduced the viscosity of the aqueous extract of rye containing xylans (Econase XT 25, Agroxyl Plus, Agroxyl Premium, Rovabio Max AP, Sunzyme). It was shown that the xylanase of precisely these EP is not inhibited by protein inhibitors of rye. At the same dosage for beta-glucanase activity, the viscosity of water-soluble beta-glucans of barley was most effectively reduced by the EP Xybeten CELL, Cellulase, Agroxyl, Agrocell, Axtra XB 201, Rovabio Max AP and Vilzyme. For all studied EP, no inhibitory effect of the barley extract on beta-glucanase activity was found.

1. Чернышев Н.И., Панин И.Г., Шумский Н.И., Гречишников В.В. Антипитательные факторы кормов. Воронеж: Воронежская областная типография, 2013. 206 с.

2. Jacob J.P., Pescatore A.J. // Ann Transl Med. 2014. Vol. 2. No. 2. Р. 20. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2014.01.02.

3. Фаритов Т.А. Корма и кормовые добавки для животных: Учебное пособие. СПб.: Лань, 2010. 304 с.

4. Лобанок А. // Наука и инновации. 2011. № 12. С. 61—64.

5. Мацерушка А.Р., Тимошек Е.В. // Известия Санкт-Петербургского государственного аграрного университета. 2017. № 47. С. 137—142.

6. Синицын А.П., Черноглазов В.М., Гусаков А.В. // Методы исследования и свойства целлюлолитических ферментов. М.: ВИНИТИ, 1990. Т. 25. С. 30—37.

7. Досон Р., Эллиот Д., Эллиот У., Джонс К. Справочник биохимика. М.: Мир, 1991, 543 c.

8. Синицын А.П. // Птицеводство. 2016. № 1. С. 19—24.

9. Синицын А.П., Рубцова Е.А., Шашков И.А., Рожкова А.М., Синицына О.А., Кондратьева Е.Г., Зоров И.Н., Мерзлов Д.А., Осипов Д.О., Матыс В.Ю. // Катализ в промышленности. 2017. Т. 17. № 4. С. 331—338.

10. Гусаков А.В., Синицын А.П. // Химия биомассы: биотоплива и биопластики / Под ред. С.Д. Варфоломеева. М.: Научный мир, 2017. С 65—99.

11. Маслаченко Д.Ю., Смирнова Е.А. // Вопросы питания. 2014. Т. 83. № 3 Приложение. С. 188.

12. Gusakov A.V. // Biochemistry. 2010. Vol. 75. No. 10. Р. 1185—1199.